Every product here runs a dispatch board.
This one also keeps your books.
The operators at the top of this industry commissioned software of their own — one system holding intake, dispatch and the books together. Fusion Link holds those three together too, at US$0.40a completed job. Every claim below links to the product's own public pages, and the rows we lose stay in.
They split on one assumption. One lane is built for an operator who owns the vehicles and puts drivers in them. The other assumes the driver owns the car. Fusion Link runs either, or a roster that mixes both — so there are two tables below, and different rows decide each one.
Your brand, your domain, your drivers. Only the system is shared.
The other answer is to build your own.
Nobody on this page is the reference point. The operators at the top of this industry commissioned software of their own. A build like that is scoped to one operator, which is why it fits and why you cannot buy it.
We do not print what a build costs, because nobody credible publishes it. We can tell you the shape. Every intake door lands one job record, one board dispatches it, one app runs it, and a double-entry ledger settles it. That is what US$0.40 a completed job buys.
It is not a build scoped to you, and we say where that shows. Flight tracking runs in Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. The email inbox sells in Malaysia, Singapore and the UAE. Driver payables are recorded, not paid out — that row is in both tables below.
The products that assume the cars are yours.
These are the names an operator searches for, and each one assumes the business owns its vehicles. Their plans meter, cap, band or service your cars. Fusion Link keeps your own cars as well, and never counts one — the same roster carries drivers who bring their own. Some of these products describe a sync out to an accounting product, on their upper plans.
Everything below follows from this. These are fleet systems — the vehicles are yours, and their plans meter, cap or service them. Fusion Link holds your own cars too, beside drivers who bring their own. It counts neither.
A job that lands in someone else's system gets typed again into yours. Fusion Link pulls it in on the login you already hold with them, so nobody retypes it.
Every product here bills a client somehow. The question is where the operation ends. Two of these describe a sync out to an accounting product, on their upper plans. Fusion Link posts every invoice, client payment, driver payout, wallet top-up and job fee as a journal entry. We have not read Good Journey's finance pages, so its column says so.
Every product here can move a job your own drivers can't cover. They differ on who receives it.
Sourced from each product's public pricing and product pages, as published — competitor figures are not converted. A dash, or “Not published”, means the capability is not described on those pages, not that the product lacks it. “Not verified” means we have not read a page that settles it, and we would rather say so. The columns follow the market in the picker — a product that names no market of its own is compared everywhere.
The products that already assume the driver owns the car.
Taxi and private-hire products, built for owner-drivers from the start. These are the ones you would actually lose a decision to, and the vehicle argument above does not land on them. One of them is not a dispatch system at all — it sells you the bookings and takes a percentage, and it is here because it competes for the same money. One of them meters completed trips, as we do, and undercuts us above a certain volume. Autocab and iCabbi publish no price. None of them publishes a general ledger on the pages we have read.
These products serve the taxi and private-hire lane, where drivers routinely own the cars they drive. So the argument is not whose vehicle it is — it is what the plan counts, and how small an operator they will sell to.
Two of the three do not publish a price at all. Those rows say so rather than guessing.
A job that lands in someone else's system gets typed again into yours. Fusion Link pulls it in on the login you already hold with them, so nobody retypes it.
Table stakes, and the table says so. Every product here runs a board, tracks the car, and gives the driver an app. The rows that decide this lane sit above and below.
A dispatch board ends at the job sheet, and the month gets rebuilt somewhere else. Fusion Link posts every invoice, client payment, driver payout, wallet top-up and job fee as a journal entry. Then it closes the month and locks it. The last row is the one we lose.
Every product here publishes a network, and this is the lane where that is genuinely table stakes. All three move the job to another company. Ours moves it to a person.
Chauffeur Drive Systems and Cabubble do not name the United States anywhere on their own pages, so they areout of this market's table. Compare Chauffeur Drive Systems. Compare Cabubble.
Sourced from each product's public pricing and product pages, as published — competitor figures are not converted. A dash, or “Not published”, means the capability is not described on those pages, not that the product lacks it. “Not verified” means we have not read a page that settles it, and we would rather say so. The columns follow the market in the picker — a product that names no market of its own is compared everywhere.
The work crosses borders.
Your roster never has to.
Every product above answers an unfilled job the same way: it hands the job to another company, and you negotiate. Fusion Link splits that into three plainer things, and none of them puts a company between you and the work.
One driver, several operators, one app.
A driver holds a membership with each operator they work for and sees all of that work in one app. You can open a job your own roster cannot cover to drivers on the network. They claim it at the Driver Pay already on the job, so there is nobody to negotiate with — and the client still books you.
A booking made overseas lands as a job here.
Companies abroad send you work through 3 supplier systems, on the login you already hold with them. Their booking arrives as an ordinary job on your board. What your driver reports goes back to them, so nobody keeps a second app open all day.
Pick up here, drop off in the next country.
Name the countries you work in, once, in your settings. Addresses across the border become available on jobs and on your booking site, and the job is priced and dispatched like any other. Your driver keeps the job to the door.
The driver network itself stays inside one country. A job you open reaches drivers where the job is, not drivers in another market — they hold the licence for the work, and they can be at the pickup.
Go deep on any one.
Each page breaks down pricing, the feature gaps, and when the other product is honestly the better fit.
Moovs
Modern US chauffeur software with a per-vehicle tiered subscription and card-fee takes.
Limo Anywhere
The legacy incumbent, with deep reservation, dispatch and reporting tools. A base subscription plus a fee on every job, built around an owned fleet and employed drivers.
Kymark
Kymark Innovations' limousine software, and the clearest vehicle meter on this page: every plan states how many bookings you may take and how many vehicles you may manage. No setup fee, and a free tier.
Good Journey
Mature chauffeur SaaS with OTA integrations and a website builder. Subscription-based, with plans that meter your vehicles and drivers.
LimoExpress
Chauffeur dispatch with a real vehicle-management module — service history, repair costs, fuel per job, insurance renewal dates. Priced by user accounts, from TEAM 5 to TEAM 50, with unlimited vehicles.
iCabbi
Enterprise taxi dispatch owned by Renault's Mobilize. Priced per driver, sold to fleets of 25+ vehicles in North America, and not published.
Yelowsoft
Taxi, private-hire and limo dispatch sold worldwide, with a Singapore page of its own. Charges nothing per vehicle or per driver — it meters trips, in monthly buckets, after a four-figure setup fee.
Autocab
The private-hire incumbent, owned by Uber, running in 33 countries. Deep dispatch plus iGo demand — priced by quote, not published.
Onde
White-label ride-hailing software with branded passenger, driver and operator apps. No per-vehicle or per-driver charge — a one-time fee from US$4,500, a monthly support fee, and a share of every fare.
Chauffeur Drive Systems
The one product here that says outright it is built for owner-drivers and subcontractors. £90 + VAT per licence per month, no contract.
Cabubble
Not a dispatch system — a UK booking channel that sends work to taxi and private-hire firms and takes a commission on it. A £395 start-up fee, no monthly subscription, and fares paid straight to the operator.
Read the rows.
Then run a week on it.
Setting up takes minutes, not a migration project. You pay US$0.40 when a job completes.